During the last few weeks, the Fiji military interim administration has banned several NGO workers and human rights activists from leaving Fiji in the course of their normal duties as representatives of their organisations and networks.
The latest victim of these travel bans is the Coordinator of the Fiji Women's Crisis Centre (FWCC) Shamima Ali (press release here).
The FWCC was recently appointed the deputy chair of the advisory committee to the Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence Program, which is an initiative between NZAid and the Pacific Islands Chiefs of Police (PICP).
Details of this story can be found in the FWCC's June newsletter.
The FWCC is regarded as one of the most successful AusAID-Pacific NGO partnerships. Shamima Ali is a remarkable woman, being the founding member of the Fiji NGO Coalition on Human Rights and is the first Pacific Islander appointed by the United Nations as a member of the Expert Group on the Rights of the Girl-Child. Ms Ali was a Pacific representative on the Commonwealth Foundation Civil Society Advisory Council , and was appointed a member of the Commonwealth Observer Group for the Nigerian Elections (April 2003) and appointed Fiji Human Rights Commissioner (February 2004) with a reappointed in February 2006.
The Director of the Fiji Human Rights Commission (an independent statutory authority), Shaista Shameem, has said that she has advised the interim government to lift the travel bans (audio comments here).
Showing posts with label Fiji. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiji. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Monday, November 20, 2006
Squatter conference, U2 concert, and conversations in immigration queues
Last week I attended quite an inspirational conference sponsored by the Pacific Island Forum Secretariat on squatter settlements in Fiji. It was attended by squatters, and key people from government and non-government agencies working with squatters and on squatter settlement issues - it was extremely interesting to say the least, but I won't say any more as I imagine a report will be coming out some time soon. There's a paper from the last workshop that I'll try and link when I have time. There's also an interesting paper here:
Urban Squatters, Informal Sector and Livelihood Strategies of Poor in Fiji Islands - Manoranjan Mohanty
Flying back home for the U2 concert did my head in a bit - it was quite difficult going from discussing living conditions with squatters to a huge, over-the-top concert, even if it is lead by a band that's done at least a little for raising awareness of how "the other 80% live". Seeing a map of the African continent flashed across the screen while Bono talked about how we in the UK, the US and Australia need to be aware of the plight of Africa was a little difficult - Africa will be drowning under the weight of poorly-thought out aid soon, and there are millions of people in South and Central America, Asia and the South Pacific that are struggling for survival also.
I made the mistake of buying Marie Claire for my flight to Port Vila this morning - it featured a piece on St Tropez and the outrageous amounts people - including Bono - fork out for the luxury of hanging out there. I can't help but feel frustrated and disillusioned by the fact that there are celebrities like Bono who rant and rave about the plight of the poor, yet holiday at places where there's a requirement that you buy a $1000+ bottle of champagne every hour that you're lounging on the beach.
Touch down in Vila, and I find myself conversing with a middle-aged guy who's come over to go diving. He asks me what I'm doing here, and I explain that I'm working for an NGO. He looks surprised, and asks "what, are there poor people here?" I explain that yes, there's very limited health care, and people die of easily preventable diseases, and that malnutrition is a growing problem. I then say that there's many people in Vila living in appalling conditions in squatter settlements. He's visibly saddened by our short, shallow conversation, shaking his head and muttering "we just have no idea, do we? we have no idea..."
No, we do not.
Edit 23/11/06...I loved this final paragraph from an article on U2 in today's The Age: "Befitting the biggest band in the world, U2 spent the first week of their Australian tour at the exclusive five-star Palazzo Versace Resort on the Gold Coast and commuted between Brisbane via private jet, helicopter and limousine for rehearsals."
Hmmmm....U2, doin' their bit for global warming and the poor!
Urban Squatters, Informal Sector and Livelihood Strategies of Poor in Fiji Islands - Manoranjan Mohanty
Flying back home for the U2 concert did my head in a bit - it was quite difficult going from discussing living conditions with squatters to a huge, over-the-top concert, even if it is lead by a band that's done at least a little for raising awareness of how "the other 80% live". Seeing a map of the African continent flashed across the screen while Bono talked about how we in the UK, the US and Australia need to be aware of the plight of Africa was a little difficult - Africa will be drowning under the weight of poorly-thought out aid soon, and there are millions of people in South and Central America, Asia and the South Pacific that are struggling for survival also.
I made the mistake of buying Marie Claire for my flight to Port Vila this morning - it featured a piece on St Tropez and the outrageous amounts people - including Bono - fork out for the luxury of hanging out there. I can't help but feel frustrated and disillusioned by the fact that there are celebrities like Bono who rant and rave about the plight of the poor, yet holiday at places where there's a requirement that you buy a $1000+ bottle of champagne every hour that you're lounging on the beach.
Touch down in Vila, and I find myself conversing with a middle-aged guy who's come over to go diving. He asks me what I'm doing here, and I explain that I'm working for an NGO. He looks surprised, and asks "what, are there poor people here?" I explain that yes, there's very limited health care, and people die of easily preventable diseases, and that malnutrition is a growing problem. I then say that there's many people in Vila living in appalling conditions in squatter settlements. He's visibly saddened by our short, shallow conversation, shaking his head and muttering "we just have no idea, do we? we have no idea..."
No, we do not.
Edit 23/11/06...I loved this final paragraph from an article on U2 in today's The Age: "Befitting the biggest band in the world, U2 spent the first week of their Australian tour at the exclusive five-star Palazzo Versace Resort on the Gold Coast and commuted between Brisbane via private jet, helicopter and limousine for rehearsals."
Hmmmm....U2, doin' their bit for global warming and the poor!
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Suva
Yesterday started with a rather amusing trip to the bus station in Nadi, where I intended to catch a bus to Suva (FD$10) but instead got waylaid by a persuasive taxi driver. Anyway, after waiting around for a while, we got enough people in the taxi to make it affordable, and off we went. As always, travelling like a local (albeit a wealthy one - most Fijians couldn't easily afford the $30 it cost us to get to Suva) was a good way to pick up a few tips on safety, and the conversations provided a wealth of information for my research. :)
So - once I'd got settled, I wandered about, went to a meeting, and then spent the afternoon bugging reception by making phone calls (phone calls have to be made by reception, and I made about 25 in the space of an hour!). Today I had back to back meetings...
I caught a glimpse of myself this morning and laughed, as I realised it only takes a day or two for me to pick up that solid walk, walking from the hips with arms swinging by my side...
Squatter settlements are clearly a growing problem in Fiji - it's all anyone will talk about with me (they're less interested in housing, sanitation etc in rural areas), and the numbers demonstrate why. I'm told that many of the resettlement programs are funded by aid - perhaps AusAID or NZAid (this is what I'm told, but I haven't confirmed it). Squatters are evicted (with some notice, it has to be said) and moved elsewhere...problem is, the new settlement often has plenty of physical infrastructure (water, roads etc) but no social infrastructure (schools, healthcare etc). On top of that is the fact that many of the squatters are single parent families, headed by women...in patriarchal and generally patrilineal Fiji, a woman estranged from her husband is particularly vulnerable, and with the exception of the lucky few, most have no option but to move to an urban centre and squat.
It's 5pm, which means I should be heading somewhere to eat and then catching a taxi back...I've only been here for a day and a half, but already I've been told numerous times not to wander the streets after about 5-5.30 pm. I've obviously never been here before, but there's plenty of anecdotal evidence as to how Suva has changed in the last decade. This shouldn't be a surprise -rapid urbanisation, growing poverty, and huge numbers of bored youth...what more could be expected?
So - once I'd got settled, I wandered about, went to a meeting, and then spent the afternoon bugging reception by making phone calls (phone calls have to be made by reception, and I made about 25 in the space of an hour!). Today I had back to back meetings...
I caught a glimpse of myself this morning and laughed, as I realised it only takes a day or two for me to pick up that solid walk, walking from the hips with arms swinging by my side...
Squatter settlements are clearly a growing problem in Fiji - it's all anyone will talk about with me (they're less interested in housing, sanitation etc in rural areas), and the numbers demonstrate why. I'm told that many of the resettlement programs are funded by aid - perhaps AusAID or NZAid (this is what I'm told, but I haven't confirmed it). Squatters are evicted (with some notice, it has to be said) and moved elsewhere...problem is, the new settlement often has plenty of physical infrastructure (water, roads etc) but no social infrastructure (schools, healthcare etc). On top of that is the fact that many of the squatters are single parent families, headed by women...in patriarchal and generally patrilineal Fiji, a woman estranged from her husband is particularly vulnerable, and with the exception of the lucky few, most have no option but to move to an urban centre and squat.
It's 5pm, which means I should be heading somewhere to eat and then catching a taxi back...I've only been here for a day and a half, but already I've been told numerous times not to wander the streets after about 5-5.30 pm. I've obviously never been here before, but there's plenty of anecdotal evidence as to how Suva has changed in the last decade. This shouldn't be a surprise -rapid urbanisation, growing poverty, and huge numbers of bored youth...what more could be expected?
Sunday, November 12, 2006
First time in Fiji...
I've just arrived in Nadi...this is going to be a rambling post riddled with grammatical errors (sorry Mum!) I'm desperate to go to bed, but want to get my impressions down...
Initial impressions...we fly in low, and I press my face against the window to catch a glimpse of the landscape that blends in with the night sky and the ocean that surrounds it...the darkness is dotted with orange fires which for an instance I imagine might be volcanoes, then I realise they're fires...but there's so many of them.
Arriving at the airport, I realise just how different Nadi is to the two Melanesian cities I've visited before, Port Vila (Vanuatu) and Honiara (Solomon Islands). Firstly, the boys playing ukelele and singing look...professional? polished? Secondly - sadly, Nadi airport lacks the camp voices that have brought a huge grin to my face elsewhere. Thirdly - everyone in customs etc seems so damn bored. I don't blame them - there's more tourists than I've seen since Bangkok, many of them incredibly young blondes (21? 22? 23 at most) who, from the wedding rings on their fingers, I imagine to be there for their honeymoons.
I get out and go to the tourism desk, then realise that it's not entirely government run, but directs you to travel agents. Two Fijian women get me a hotel room, call the bus...twice...and it's then that I realise that I'm really in Fiji, and not Thailand, because the bus takes more than half an hour to make the 5 minute trip. I chat with the young Indo-Fijian driver on the way - he says most people in Fiji don't own land (hmm, some of that Indo-Fijian perspective there?), and that land issues are bigger on the western side of the island where all the farmers are. I later read that land issues are different on the western side because leadership/governance has been handled differently.
According to him, there's lots of development and therefore plenty of housing in Suva (hmmm...a reminder that stats are important, and that government officials as well as those "at the grassroots" are worth talking to!). He wanted to know whether I'd have time to visit people in their homes - shame-faced, I had to tell him no. I'm sure my explanation - that I have very little time, and that I need to talk to people in NGOs on this trip - went down like a lead balloon (and fair call, too!) According to this young Indo-Fijian (who, I must add, seemed to have at least a little pent-up frustration!), the Fijian landowners come around towards the end of a lease, and put the rent up massively, and then when the lessors can't or won't pay, evict them. He said that "if you leave your clothes out, they will move in and take over your house". I'm not sure what that means exactly, but his sentiment was clear.
This young guy also said that Fijians are now claiming rights over the sea too, and he expressed his frustration that they want to make people pay for access to the beach, to swim etc.
Oh...those fires?? He told me that they're fires in the sugar cane fields. Apparently the harvesting season is drawing to a close, because hurricane season is about to start. :)
Initial impressions...we fly in low, and I press my face against the window to catch a glimpse of the landscape that blends in with the night sky and the ocean that surrounds it...the darkness is dotted with orange fires which for an instance I imagine might be volcanoes, then I realise they're fires...but there's so many of them.
Arriving at the airport, I realise just how different Nadi is to the two Melanesian cities I've visited before, Port Vila (Vanuatu) and Honiara (Solomon Islands). Firstly, the boys playing ukelele and singing look...professional? polished? Secondly - sadly, Nadi airport lacks the camp voices that have brought a huge grin to my face elsewhere. Thirdly - everyone in customs etc seems so damn bored. I don't blame them - there's more tourists than I've seen since Bangkok, many of them incredibly young blondes (21? 22? 23 at most) who, from the wedding rings on their fingers, I imagine to be there for their honeymoons.
I get out and go to the tourism desk, then realise that it's not entirely government run, but directs you to travel agents. Two Fijian women get me a hotel room, call the bus...twice...and it's then that I realise that I'm really in Fiji, and not Thailand, because the bus takes more than half an hour to make the 5 minute trip. I chat with the young Indo-Fijian driver on the way - he says most people in Fiji don't own land (hmm, some of that Indo-Fijian perspective there?), and that land issues are bigger on the western side of the island where all the farmers are. I later read that land issues are different on the western side because leadership/governance has been handled differently.
According to him, there's lots of development and therefore plenty of housing in Suva (hmmm...a reminder that stats are important, and that government officials as well as those "at the grassroots" are worth talking to!). He wanted to know whether I'd have time to visit people in their homes - shame-faced, I had to tell him no. I'm sure my explanation - that I have very little time, and that I need to talk to people in NGOs on this trip - went down like a lead balloon (and fair call, too!) According to this young Indo-Fijian (who, I must add, seemed to have at least a little pent-up frustration!), the Fijian landowners come around towards the end of a lease, and put the rent up massively, and then when the lessors can't or won't pay, evict them. He said that "if you leave your clothes out, they will move in and take over your house". I'm not sure what that means exactly, but his sentiment was clear.
This young guy also said that Fijians are now claiming rights over the sea too, and he expressed his frustration that they want to make people pay for access to the beach, to swim etc.
Oh...those fires?? He told me that they're fires in the sugar cane fields. Apparently the harvesting season is drawing to a close, because hurricane season is about to start. :)
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Temperatures rise in Fiji
Some of the alerts arriving in my inbox...
On another note, despite suggestions to the contrary on the DFAT website, nobody seems to think much is going on in the Solomon Islands. Phew!
WEDNESDAY 5PM 1 NOVEMBER 2006
FIJI'S PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE: PRIME MINISTER LAISENIA QARASE
WEDNESDAY 1 NOVEMBER 2006
ADDRESS TO THE NATION
Good evening my fellow citizens.
I address you this evening about events involving the Republic of Fiji Military Forces that are causing so much anxiety, uncertainty, and fear in our land. This is related specifically to public threats by the Commander of the Army to overthrow the elected Government of Fiji. This is the Government I was given the mandate to lead in the May General Election.
I can affirm that the Police are continuing their investigations into the threats by the Commander. I expect that the Army will respect the authority of the Police and will fully cooperate in these investigations.
Now, over the past few months, I have exercised great patience in my attitude to the various statements by the Commander, condemning the Government for a whole variety of reasons.
Following developments yesterday and renewed threats as reported in the media, I called meetings this morning of the National Security Council and the Multi-Party Cabinet, comprising SDL and Fiji Labour Party Ministers.
I now wish to explain the actions we are taking.
To begin with, let me take you back to a meeting convened earlier this year by His Excellency the Vice President, in his capacity as Acting President. I attended that meeting along with the Commander of the RFMF. Its purpose was to create a positive and open atmosphere for dialogue on issues of concern raised by the Military. I readily agreed to this because I have always favoured this approach to solving problems. It is consistent with the good-faith principles called for by our Constitution for settling differences.
There was also agreement that the Commander would not make public statements without clearing them first with the Prime Minister.
I met with the Commander under these arrangements. The problem that immediately arose was he expected me to virtually follow his orders.
As Head of a democratically- elected Government I could not do that.
It wasn¢t long before the Commander again began to go public, in breach of the agreement he had reached with the Acting President and me.
To justify this, he attempted to argue that the Army had a broad mandate to ensure the well being of Fiji and its people. This, he claimed, had been transferred to the 1997 Constitution from the 1990 document.
The prevailing view among legal experts, however, is that the Commander¢s interpretation is wrong.
Our present Constitution legitimises the existence of the RFMF, but not the broadened responsibilities given to it in the 1990 Constitution. In other words, the constitutional and statutory authority of the RFMF is strictly confined to maintaining and safeguarding national security within a democracy.
The Cabinet, therefore, decided to seek clarification from the Supreme Court on the role of the Military. This was a reasonable position to take, given the circumstances. It also reflected our desire for a conclusive legal finding. The Constitution allows for this procedure.
The Minister of Home Affairs was asked to consult with the RFMF to establish joint terms of reference for the approach to the Supreme Court.
The Army did not respond.
And then, in view of the Commander¢s continuing verbal attacks on the Government, the Cabinet decided it would go ahead with its proposal for a legal opinion from the Supreme Court. It, therefore, asked His Excellency the President to refer the issue to the Court, in accordance with the Constitution.
For the Government and the RFMF, the sensible course was to await the clarification by the Court.
Unfortunately, instead of doing this, the Commander and the Army have launched a campaign of threats to force the Government to resign.
The Police, as I have said, have now started an independent inquiry into the Commander¢s threats to remove the lawfully elected Government of Fiji.
The Commander makes many untruthful allegations against the Government. He regularly expresses unsubstantiated accusations about widespread corruption. My position on this is very clear. The Government has taken a strong stand against corruption. Draft legislation to combat this is being prepared. In the meantime, the law enforcement authorities must be allowed to do their duty when allegations are made. Those making allegations against the Government must provide evidence to the Police.
When they do not do this there is a suspicion that these accusations are just a cover for a deeper agenda to overthrow a democratically- elected Government.
We must ask whether the Commander is being used or influenced by unscrupulous people opposed to certain items of legislation introduced by the Government. Is the Commander being manipulated by those with a certain political agenda?
If this is so, those involved are acting to serve their own purposes.
I declare emphatically that there is absolutely no question of me resigning in response to the current situation, or of my Government stepping down.
We have the constitutional authority and the support of the people to rule now and for the next five years.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Army is an important institution in Fiji . It is an agency of the State which has won international respect and acclaim for its service to international peacekeeping.
Whoever is Commander should be ever vigilant in protecting its integrity and reputation, and ensuring it follows the rule of law.
It should be a matter of serious concern to us all that officers who have stood for the professional values of loyalty and legality, are being pushed aside and relieved of their appointments.
Now let me repeat, that the Government I lead was legitimately elected in May this year. I was constitutionally appointed to form a Government by the President, acting in his own judgement.
His Excellency determined that I had the confidence of the House of Representatives. That confidence remains. It enabled me to appoint Fiji ¢s first Multi-Party Cabinet, comprising elected representatives of Fiji ¢s main communities. The Multi-Party Cabinet, as the executive arm of Government, is proceeding with an agenda that reflects the wishes of all the people of Fiji .
Members of the Cabinet together contributed to a new Strategic Development Plan that was recently endorsed at a National Economic Summit. The Plan provides a clear course and targets for Fiji ¢s growth in the next five years.
On Friday we will be announcing our 2007 Budget setting out our spending priorities and goals for the country in the next 12 months.
These policy and development initiatives are what we were elected to do.
As part of the Government¢s response to current events, I have today, with the authority of Cabinet, requested the Minister for Fijian Affairs Lands and Provincial Development, to consult with the Chairperson of the Great Council of Chiefs on convening a special meeting of the GCC next week.
It is crucially important for us to seek the advice of the GCC because the legislative measures the Commander says he is opposed to are being undertaken with the specific authorisation of the Council.
Furthermore, the GCC is a repository of chiefly wisdom and authority. I am sure you all agree there is a role for it in assisting to resolve the current crisis.
In 1987 and 2000 it demonstrated its ability to deal with the fundamental issues of peace and stability.
I give you now the same undertaking I have given to His Excellency the President. I have informed His Excellency that I am ready to engage in further discussions with the Commander on the issues that are of on-going concern to the Military. I will take part in such dialogue with an open mind, with a view to finding resolutions that serve the best interests of Fiji .
Having said, that I must also stress that the Army is under the control and authority of the elected Government.
The rule of law must prevail. No one is above the law, or has the right to interfere with the legal processes.
Fiji has previously experienced the tragedy and turmoil of illegal armed intervention in the business of the State. The last time this happened was in 2000.
One factor of compelling importance for the people of Fiji to be aware of, is that the international environment today is totally different from what it was in 1987 and 2000. The international community is now more proactive in protecting democratic governments when the rule of law and constitutionality are threatened or overturned. Our international friends are already coming out very strongly in support of the maintenance of democracy and constitutional rule in Fiji .
I have today received messages from the Governments of Australia, NZ and the United States . They too have expressed strong support for our elected Government. They have called on the Military to respect democracy and the rule of law. They are urging the Military to confine themselves to their proper role in a democracy.
If the Army fails to do this there will be dire consequences for Fiji . For a start, our tourism industry, our biggest direct employer and earner of foreign exchange, would be severely damaged. Thousands of jobs would be lost and ordinary people would suffer.
Following the crisis of 2000, the members of the Pacific Island Forum adopted the Biketawa Declaration. This Declaration provides the mandate for intervention by member governments at the invitation of the lawful authority in a Forum country affected by crisis.
Let me issue a warning, as well, that if the democratically elected Government of Fiji is overthrown, there is every likelihood this would severely prejudice the continued participation by Fiji in international peacekeeping operations.
I very much hope, then, that those in the Military, will keep in mind the catastrophic consequences of the threats that are being made against the elected Government of the people of Fiji .
I remain confident that sound judgement and wisdom will prevail about the overriding importance of the rule of law. I call on the churches and people to pray for our country.
Let us show the world that we have the ability and the will to solve our internal difficulties, as we have done before.
God bless you all, and God bless Fiji .
For response by Military Chief, go here.
The Australian military should not intervene in Fiji 's escalating political crisis, a Fijian academic has warned.
Australia is sending warships to the South Pacific nation to evacuate any Australians if needed amid fears of another coup as Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase refuses demands that he resign in a stand-off with the military.
However, a former member of Fiji 's Constitution Review Commission and Australian National University academic, Professor Brij Lai, says Australia should not use the ships for any military task.
"I think this would be hugely counter-productive because any scent of outside intervention will simply get the army's back up," he told the Nine Network.
"This is not the time for military intervention."
"This is a time for dialogue, for diplomacy for regional countries in the South Pacific, including Australia and New Zealand , to lend all the support they can to get the army and the government together," Professor Lai said.
But he said Mr Qarase should not be pushed into resigning.
"I don't think he should, I mean he is a democratically elected leader."
"The second point is it's the first time in the history of Fiji you have a multi-party Cabinet where members of the former opposition party are in government."
"This experiment must be allowed to succeed because if it doesn't, we don't have any future."
On another note, despite suggestions to the contrary on the DFAT website, nobody seems to think much is going on in the Solomon Islands. Phew!
WEDNESDAY 5PM 1 NOVEMBER 2006
FIJI'S PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE: PRIME MINISTER LAISENIA QARASE
WEDNESDAY 1 NOVEMBER 2006
ADDRESS TO THE NATION
Good evening my fellow citizens.
I address you this evening about events involving the Republic of Fiji Military Forces that are causing so much anxiety, uncertainty, and fear in our land. This is related specifically to public threats by the Commander of the Army to overthrow the elected Government of Fiji. This is the Government I was given the mandate to lead in the May General Election.
I can affirm that the Police are continuing their investigations into the threats by the Commander. I expect that the Army will respect the authority of the Police and will fully cooperate in these investigations.
Now, over the past few months, I have exercised great patience in my attitude to the various statements by the Commander, condemning the Government for a whole variety of reasons.
Following developments yesterday and renewed threats as reported in the media, I called meetings this morning of the National Security Council and the Multi-Party Cabinet, comprising SDL and Fiji Labour Party Ministers.
I now wish to explain the actions we are taking.
To begin with, let me take you back to a meeting convened earlier this year by His Excellency the Vice President, in his capacity as Acting President. I attended that meeting along with the Commander of the RFMF. Its purpose was to create a positive and open atmosphere for dialogue on issues of concern raised by the Military. I readily agreed to this because I have always favoured this approach to solving problems. It is consistent with the good-faith principles called for by our Constitution for settling differences.
There was also agreement that the Commander would not make public statements without clearing them first with the Prime Minister.
I met with the Commander under these arrangements. The problem that immediately arose was he expected me to virtually follow his orders.
As Head of a democratically- elected Government I could not do that.
It wasn¢t long before the Commander again began to go public, in breach of the agreement he had reached with the Acting President and me.
To justify this, he attempted to argue that the Army had a broad mandate to ensure the well being of Fiji and its people. This, he claimed, had been transferred to the 1997 Constitution from the 1990 document.
The prevailing view among legal experts, however, is that the Commander¢s interpretation is wrong.
Our present Constitution legitimises the existence of the RFMF, but not the broadened responsibilities given to it in the 1990 Constitution. In other words, the constitutional and statutory authority of the RFMF is strictly confined to maintaining and safeguarding national security within a democracy.
The Cabinet, therefore, decided to seek clarification from the Supreme Court on the role of the Military. This was a reasonable position to take, given the circumstances. It also reflected our desire for a conclusive legal finding. The Constitution allows for this procedure.
The Minister of Home Affairs was asked to consult with the RFMF to establish joint terms of reference for the approach to the Supreme Court.
The Army did not respond.
And then, in view of the Commander¢s continuing verbal attacks on the Government, the Cabinet decided it would go ahead with its proposal for a legal opinion from the Supreme Court. It, therefore, asked His Excellency the President to refer the issue to the Court, in accordance with the Constitution.
For the Government and the RFMF, the sensible course was to await the clarification by the Court.
Unfortunately, instead of doing this, the Commander and the Army have launched a campaign of threats to force the Government to resign.
The Police, as I have said, have now started an independent inquiry into the Commander¢s threats to remove the lawfully elected Government of Fiji.
The Commander makes many untruthful allegations against the Government. He regularly expresses unsubstantiated accusations about widespread corruption. My position on this is very clear. The Government has taken a strong stand against corruption. Draft legislation to combat this is being prepared. In the meantime, the law enforcement authorities must be allowed to do their duty when allegations are made. Those making allegations against the Government must provide evidence to the Police.
When they do not do this there is a suspicion that these accusations are just a cover for a deeper agenda to overthrow a democratically- elected Government.
We must ask whether the Commander is being used or influenced by unscrupulous people opposed to certain items of legislation introduced by the Government. Is the Commander being manipulated by those with a certain political agenda?
If this is so, those involved are acting to serve their own purposes.
I declare emphatically that there is absolutely no question of me resigning in response to the current situation, or of my Government stepping down.
We have the constitutional authority and the support of the people to rule now and for the next five years.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Army is an important institution in Fiji . It is an agency of the State which has won international respect and acclaim for its service to international peacekeeping.
Whoever is Commander should be ever vigilant in protecting its integrity and reputation, and ensuring it follows the rule of law.
It should be a matter of serious concern to us all that officers who have stood for the professional values of loyalty and legality, are being pushed aside and relieved of their appointments.
Now let me repeat, that the Government I lead was legitimately elected in May this year. I was constitutionally appointed to form a Government by the President, acting in his own judgement.
His Excellency determined that I had the confidence of the House of Representatives. That confidence remains. It enabled me to appoint Fiji ¢s first Multi-Party Cabinet, comprising elected representatives of Fiji ¢s main communities. The Multi-Party Cabinet, as the executive arm of Government, is proceeding with an agenda that reflects the wishes of all the people of Fiji .
Members of the Cabinet together contributed to a new Strategic Development Plan that was recently endorsed at a National Economic Summit. The Plan provides a clear course and targets for Fiji ¢s growth in the next five years.
On Friday we will be announcing our 2007 Budget setting out our spending priorities and goals for the country in the next 12 months.
These policy and development initiatives are what we were elected to do.
As part of the Government¢s response to current events, I have today, with the authority of Cabinet, requested the Minister for Fijian Affairs Lands and Provincial Development, to consult with the Chairperson of the Great Council of Chiefs on convening a special meeting of the GCC next week.
It is crucially important for us to seek the advice of the GCC because the legislative measures the Commander says he is opposed to are being undertaken with the specific authorisation of the Council.
Furthermore, the GCC is a repository of chiefly wisdom and authority. I am sure you all agree there is a role for it in assisting to resolve the current crisis.
In 1987 and 2000 it demonstrated its ability to deal with the fundamental issues of peace and stability.
I give you now the same undertaking I have given to His Excellency the President. I have informed His Excellency that I am ready to engage in further discussions with the Commander on the issues that are of on-going concern to the Military. I will take part in such dialogue with an open mind, with a view to finding resolutions that serve the best interests of Fiji .
Having said, that I must also stress that the Army is under the control and authority of the elected Government.
The rule of law must prevail. No one is above the law, or has the right to interfere with the legal processes.
Fiji has previously experienced the tragedy and turmoil of illegal armed intervention in the business of the State. The last time this happened was in 2000.
One factor of compelling importance for the people of Fiji to be aware of, is that the international environment today is totally different from what it was in 1987 and 2000. The international community is now more proactive in protecting democratic governments when the rule of law and constitutionality are threatened or overturned. Our international friends are already coming out very strongly in support of the maintenance of democracy and constitutional rule in Fiji .
I have today received messages from the Governments of Australia, NZ and the United States . They too have expressed strong support for our elected Government. They have called on the Military to respect democracy and the rule of law. They are urging the Military to confine themselves to their proper role in a democracy.
If the Army fails to do this there will be dire consequences for Fiji . For a start, our tourism industry, our biggest direct employer and earner of foreign exchange, would be severely damaged. Thousands of jobs would be lost and ordinary people would suffer.
Following the crisis of 2000, the members of the Pacific Island Forum adopted the Biketawa Declaration. This Declaration provides the mandate for intervention by member governments at the invitation of the lawful authority in a Forum country affected by crisis.
Let me issue a warning, as well, that if the democratically elected Government of Fiji is overthrown, there is every likelihood this would severely prejudice the continued participation by Fiji in international peacekeeping operations.
I very much hope, then, that those in the Military, will keep in mind the catastrophic consequences of the threats that are being made against the elected Government of the people of Fiji .
I remain confident that sound judgement and wisdom will prevail about the overriding importance of the rule of law. I call on the churches and people to pray for our country.
Let us show the world that we have the ability and the will to solve our internal difficulties, as we have done before.
God bless you all, and God bless Fiji .
For response by Military Chief, go here.
The Australian military should not intervene in Fiji 's escalating political crisis, a Fijian academic has warned.
Australia is sending warships to the South Pacific nation to evacuate any Australians if needed amid fears of another coup as Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase refuses demands that he resign in a stand-off with the military.
However, a former member of Fiji 's Constitution Review Commission and Australian National University academic, Professor Brij Lai, says Australia should not use the ships for any military task.
"I think this would be hugely counter-productive because any scent of outside intervention will simply get the army's back up," he told the Nine Network.
"This is not the time for military intervention."
"This is a time for dialogue, for diplomacy for regional countries in the South Pacific, including Australia and New Zealand , to lend all the support they can to get the army and the government together," Professor Lai said.
But he said Mr Qarase should not be pushed into resigning.
"I don't think he should, I mean he is a democratically elected leader."
"The second point is it's the first time in the history of Fiji you have a multi-party Cabinet where members of the former opposition party are in government."
"This experiment must be allowed to succeed because if it doesn't, we don't have any future."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)